Medium Well Please
Monday, July 13th, 2009So we talked about the steak (the message), and we will get to the sizzle… but today… medium well.
The medium is usually the least thought about of the three M’s. It is usually inherited, or the simplest or the most cost effective. Sometimes the choice is made to upgrade the medium, but even that is usually not an intentional decision. It is most often the desire to amplify the sizzle. So we upgrade from paper to digital, from stage to the screen because the assumption is that the bigger the medium, the better.
The thing is each medium has its own advantages and drawbacks. Sending a letter may be slow and less visual, but it has the potential of being extremely personal. Creating a piece for the television may be flashy and impressive, but may lose some of the elements essential to dialogue. Which brings me to an observation:
The more obvious the medium, the more the story must be scripted. That is, a medium like television does not leave much for the imagination. We see a direct representation of the message. Therefore, the story must be told with absolute intentionality to get the point across. At the same time, television leaves very little to the imagination. Boy kisses girl… you see it. Bad guy’s vehicle goes boom… good guy wins. You get it… That isn’t to say there isn’t art in film and television, just that the process of dialogue is removed by several steps. This absolutely affects how the message is perceived and interacted with.
I am a personal fan of the stage… for obvious reasons. I have found it to have most of the advantages of the screen, with fewer drawbacks. Specifically, the stage is temporal. That is, a play, or an act or a speech exists as a onetime experience in dialogue. While there is a presentation, the recipients are present and able to interact with the message. At the same time, the medium is formal, and does not usually allow for disordered dialogue.
My purpose today is not to talk about every known medium, but I would like to address the medium of digital communication… specifically email and the like. It wasn’t long ago that the inter office memo was the main form of communication in the towers across North America. It was a medium that conjured up thoughts and feelings even before the recipient read the content. It is the same for email, and text, and all other digital mediums. We already have pre-conceived ideas about a message when we receive it on our blackberry, or computer, or iphone or what have you. The medium affects the message. Try send the same message to yourself by email, text, phone, and paper letter and see how the experience of the message changes.
There will be more on this down the road. For today… medium affects the message. In some cases it can even define the message. It is not only important to know what you are communicating, but through what you are communicating. But in the spirit of this blog… I think I need a steak for lunch… medium well.
